Outcomes of patients with gallbladder cancer presenting with acute cholecystitis.

The main purpose of this study is to explore the outcomes of patients found to have gallbladder cancer during investigation and diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The incidence of primary gallbladder cancer co-existing in acute cholecystitis is not well defined in the literature, with anecdotal reports suggesting that they experience worse outcomes than patients with gallbladder cancer found incidentally. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with gallbladder cancer managed at the Canberra Health Service between 1998 and May 2022 were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were diagnosed with primary gallbladder cancer during the study period with a mean age of 70.4 years (SD 11.4, range 59-81.8 years) and a female preponderance (74% versus 26%) with a ratio of 2.8. Twenty (31%) patients presented with acute calculus cholecystitis and were found to have a primary gallbladder cancer. This group of patients were older and predominantly female, but the difference was not statistically significant. The overall 5-year survival in the cohort was 20% (stage 1 63%, stage 2 23%, stage 3 16%, and stage 4 0%). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between those who presented with acute cholecystitis vs other presentations. CONCLUSIONS: A third of the patients with gallbladder cancer presented with acute cholecystitis. There was no statistically significant difference in survival in those with bile spillage during cholecystectomy as well those presenting with acute cholecystitis.

Gallbladder perforation in acute acalculous vs. calculous cholecystitis: a retrospective comparative cohort study with 10-year single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Gallstones are a well-known risk factor for acute cholecystitis. However, their role as a risk factor for gallbladder perforation (GBP) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effect of gallstones on the development of GBP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This large-scale retrospective cohort study enroled consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The primary endpoint was the role of gallstones as a risk factor for developing GBP. Secondary endpoints included the clinical characteristics of GBP, other risk factors for GBP, differences in clinical outcomes between patients with acalculous cholecystitis (AC) and calculous cholecystitis (CC), and the influence of cholecystectomy timing. RESULTS: A total of 4497 patients were included in this study. The incidence of GBP was significantly higher in the AC group compared to the CC group (5.6% vs. 1.0%, P <0.001). However, there were no differences in ICU admission and hospital stay durations. The incidence of overall complications was significantly higher in the AC group than in the CC group (2.2% vs. 1.0%, P <0.001). Patients with AC had a higher risk of developing GBP than those with CC (odds ratio, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.94-8.33). In addition, older age (≥60 years), male sex, comorbidities, poor performance status, and concomitant acute cholangitis were associated with the development of GBP. Furthermore, the incidence of GBP was significantly higher in the delayed cholecystectomy group than in the early cholecystectomy group (2.0% vs. 0.9%, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AC is a significant risk factor for GBP. Furthermore, early cholecystectomy can significantly reduce GBP-related morbidity and mortality.

The use of fully covered self-expandable metal stents in the endoscopic treatment of portal cavernoma cholangiopathy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are different therapeutic approaches for biliary strictures and reducing portal hypertension in patients with symptomatic portal cavernoma cholangiopathy (PCC). Endoscopic treatment includes endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EST), dilation of stricture with a biliary balloon, placement of plastic stent(s) and stone extraction. Fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) is placed as a rescuer in case of haemobilia seen after EST, dilation of stricture and removal of plastic stent rather than the stricture treatment itself. In this retrospective observational study, we sought to assess the clinical outcomes of FCSEMS as the initial treatment for PCC-related biliary strictures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve symptomatic patients with PCC both clinically and radiologically between July 2009 and February 2019 were examined. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and cholangiography were employed as the diagnostic imaging methods. Chandra-Sarin classification was used to distinguish between biliary abnormalities in terms of localization. Llop classification was used to group biliary abnormalities associated with PCC. Endoscopic partial sphincterotomy was performed in all the patients. If patients with dominant strictures 6-8-mm balloon dilation was first performed. This was followed by removal of the stones if exist. Finally, FCSEMS placed. The stents were removed 6-12 weeks later. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 40.9 ± 10.3 years, and 91.6% of the patients were male. Majority of the patients (n = 9) were noncirrhotic. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) findings showed that 11 of the 12 patients were Chandra Type I and one was Chandra Type IIIa. All the 12 patients were Llop Grade 3. All patients had biliary involvement in the form of strictures. Stent placement was successful in all patients. FCSEMSs were retained for a median period of 45 days (30-60). Seven (58.3%) patients developed acute cholecystitis. There was no occurrence of bleeding or other complications associated with FCSEMS replacement or removal. All patients were asymptomatic during median 3 years (1-10) follow up period. CONCLUSIONS: FCSEMS placement is an effective method in biliary strictures in case of PCC. Acute cholecystitis is encountered frequently after FCSEMS, but majority of patients respond to the medical treatment. Patients should be followed in terms of the relapse of biliary strictures.

What is the effect of percutaneous cholesistostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis? when is the right time for the procedure?

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is one of the most common emergency diseases in surgical practice. Although the gold standard treatment is laparoscopic cholecystectomy, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is performed in some patients due to age, comorbidity, and delays in admission. We aimed to investigate the effect of timing on the clinical process of patients undergoing PC. METHODS: Patients who underwent PC between February 2017 and December 2021 were included in the study. Those who un-derwent PC in the first 72 h were determined as the early PC group, and those who underwent PC after 72 h were determined as the late PC group. Demographic information of the patients, clinical information before drainage, biochemical values of the first 3 days, length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality in the early and late period after drainage, and elective cholecystectomy information were recorded. These data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients were included in the study. Early PC was performed in 98 patients (80.3%) and late PC was performed in 24 patients (19.7%). The median follow-up period was 26.6 months (min: 0.25-max: 67) in the early PC group and 26.4 months (min: 0.6-max: 66) in the late PC group (P=0.408). There was no statistically significant difference in mean age, distribu-tion of males and women, concomitant disease, Charlson Comorbidity Index, hepatopancreatobiliary pathology (HPBP), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in history and grade (TG18) compared to Tokyo classification (P>0.05). There was no difference between the biochemical parameters (P>0.05). In our study, the median length of hospital stay was 6 (min: 2-max: 36) days in the early PC group, and the median was 9 days (min: 5-max: 20) in the late PC group (P<0.001). A total of 25 patients developed HPBP after PC, 16 of which were AC. There was no statistically significant difference between the early and late PC groups in terms of HPBP develop-ment after PC (P=0.576). There was no statistically significant difference between the early and late PC group in terms of the rate of surgery and type of operation (emergency/elective, open/laparoscopic/conversion, total/subtotal, duration) (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Discussions about the right timing are ongoing. In our study, we found that patients who underwent early PC had shorter hospital stays. There was no difference between the early and late groups in terms of patient characteristics and severity of AC. PC procedure in AC should be based on algorithms determined by objective data instead of patient-based indications with ran-domized controlled trials.

Prospective validation of the Israeli Score for the prediction of common bile duct stones in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Existing guidelines for predicting common bile duct stones (CBDS) are not specific for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC). This paper is a posthoc analysis of the S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C study aiming to prospectively validate on a large independent cohort of patients the Israeli Score (IS) in predicting CBDS in patients with ACC. METHODS: The S.P.Ri.M.A.C.C. study is an observational multicenter prospective study endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). Between September 1st, 2021, and September 1st, 2022, 1201 participants were included. The Chi-Square test was used to compare categorical data. A Cochran-Armitage test was run to determine whether a linear trend existed between the IS and the presence of CBDS. To assess the accuracy of the prediction model, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. Logistic regression was run to obtain Odds Ratio (OR). A two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The rate of CBDS was 1.8% in patients with an IS of 0, 4.2% in patients with an IS of 1, 24.5% in patients with 2 and 56.3% in patients with 3 (p < 0.001). The Cochran-Armitage test of trend showed a statistically significant linear trend, p < 0.001. Patients with an IS of 3 had 64.4 times (95% CI 24.8-166.9) higher odds of having associated CBDS than patients with an IS of 0. The AUC of the ROC curve of IS for the prediction of CBDS was 0.809 (95% CI 0.752-0.865, p < 0.001). By applying the highest cut-off point (3), the specificity reached 99%, while using the lowest cut-off value (0), the sensitivity reached 100%. CONCLUSION: The IS is a reliable tool to predict CBDS associated with ACC. The algorithm derived from the IS could optimize the management of patients with ACC.

Colecistectomía laparoscópica urgente por colecistitis aguda litiásica en Pediatría / Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a result of acute calculous cholecystitis in pediatrics

Introducción: Pese al aumento en la prevalencia de colelitiasisdurante las últimas décadas, no se han desarrollado recomendacionessobre el mejor tratamiento de la colecistitis aguda litiásica (CA) enPediatría. Caso clínico: Paciente varón de 4 años y 20 kg de peso sin antecedentes de interés, que acude derivado por sepsis de origen abdominal. Analíticamente destaca leucocitosis con hemoglobina, función hepáticay bilirrubina normales. La ecografía abdominal muestra colelitiasis, hidrops vesicular y proceso inflamatorio compatible con plastrón apendicular. En laparoscopia diagnóstica se observa apéndice macroscópicamentenormal y colecistitis aguda. Ante la situación del paciente se realiza,conjuntamente con Cirugía General, colecistectomía laparoscópica. Elpaciente se recupera sin incidencias tras 5 días de ingreso bajo coberturacon piperacilina-tazobactam. Comentarios: No existen recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento dela CA en niños. En los pacientes sépticos, la colaboración entre cirujanospediátricos y cirujanos generales permite contemplar la colecistectomíaurgente como una opción segura.(AU)

Introduction: In spite of the increase in the prevalence of cholelithiasis in the last decades, no recommendations regarding the best treatmentof acute calculous cholecystitis (AC) in pediatrics have been developed. Clinical case: 4-year-old, 20kg male patient with no significanthistory referred to our institution as a result of abdominal sepsis. Theblood count showed leukocytosis, with normal hemoglobin and bilirubinlevels, and a normal liver function. The abdominal ultrasonography revealed cholelithiasis, gallbladder hydrops, and an inflammatory processcompatible with appendicular plastron. In the diagnostic laparoscopy,the appendix was macroscopically normal, and acute cholecystitis wasobserved. Given the patient’s situation, and in cooperation with theGeneral Surgery Department, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carriedout. The patient recovered uneventfully on hospitalization day 5 underpiperacillin-tazobactam treatment. Discussion: There are no recommendations regarding AC treatmentin children. In septic patients, cooperation between general and pediatricsurgeons allows urgent cholecystectomy to be considered as a safe option.(AU)

Is conservative management a safe approach for patients with acute acalculous cholecystitis presenting with an acute abdomen?

Patients with acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) often present with acute abdominal symptoms. However, recent clinical studies have suggested that some patients with AAC and an acute abdomen, especially when caused by viruses or rheumatic disease, may not require cholecystectomy and that conservative treatment is adequate. Whether cholecystectomy is superior to conservative treatment for patients with AAC presenting with a severe acute abdomen is still uncertain. This was a case series study of AAC-related literature published between 1960 and 2022. In total, 171 cases (104 viral infection-associated AAC and 67 rheumatic disease-associated AAC) were included. The prognoses of patients receiving cholecystectomy or conservative treatment were compared. To account for confounding factors, etiological stratification and logistic regression were performed. The prognosis was similar for patients undergoing cholecystectomy and conservative treatment (P value .364), and virus infection-associated AAC had a better prognosis than rheumatic disease-associated AAC (P value .032). In patients with AAC caused by viruses or rheumatic disease, the acute abdomen can be adequately managed by conservative treatment of the underlying etiology and does not mandate surgical intervention.

Non-operative management of cirrhotic patients with acute calculous cholecystitis: How effective is it?

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) in patients with cirrhosis was proposed. We examined the outcomes of cirrhotic patients with ACC treated with cholecystectomy compared to NOM. METHODS: We analyzed the 2017-Nationwide Readmissions Database including cirrhotic patients with ACC. Patients were stratified: cholecystectomy, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCT), and antibiotics only. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: complications, failure of NOM. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mortality, length of stay (LOS), and charges. RESULTS: 3454 patients were identified. 1832 underwent cholecystectomy, 360 PCT, and 1262 were treated with antibiotics. PCT patients had higher mortality 16.9% vs. the antibiotics group 10.9% vs. cholecystectomy group 4.2%. PCT patients had longer LOS, but lower charges compared to the operative group. Failure of NOM was 28.2%. On regression, PCT was associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: ACC remains a morbid disease in cirrhosis patients. One in three failed NOM, had longer LOS, and higher mortality. Further studies are warranted to identify predictors of NOM failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic.

Análisis de los factores de riesgo para complicaciones en la colecistitis aguda litiásica. Deconstrucción de las Tokyo Guidelines / Risk factors for complications in acute calculous cholecystitis. Deconstruction of the Tokyo Guidelines

Introducción: Analizar los factores de riesgo de complicaciones para colecistitis aguda litiásica confrontándolos a las Tokyo Guidelines. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de 963 pacientes con colecistitis aguda durante 5 años. Se seleccionaron 725 pacientes con colecistitis aguda litiásica «pura», y analizaron 166 variables mediante regresión logística, incluyendo todos los factores de riesgo de las Tokyo Guidelines. Mediante el Propensity Score Matching, se seleccionaron subpoblaciones comparables de 75 pacientes y se analizaron las complicaciones según el tratamiento realizado (quirúrgico/no quirúrgico) y se utilizó el fallo en el rescate como indicador de calidad del tratamiento en la colecistitis aguda litiásica. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue de 69 años (RIQ 53-80). La mayoría de los pacientes fueron ASA II o III (85,1%). El 21% de las colecistitis fueron leves, el 39% moderadas y el 40% graves. Se colecistectomizó al 95% de los pacientes. El 43% de los pacientes se complicaron y la mortalidad fue del 3,6%. Los factores de riesgo independientes para complicaciones graves fueron ASA>II, tumor sólido sin metástasis e insuficiencia renal. El fallo en el rescate (8%) fue mayor en los no operados (32% vs. 7%; P=0,002). Tras realizar el Propensity Score Matching, la tasa de complicaciones graves fueron comparables entre operados y no operados (48,5% vs. 62,5%; P=0,21). Conclusiones: La colecistectomía precoz es el tratamiento preferente para la colecistitis aguda litiásica. Solo tres de los factores de las Tokyo Guidelines son variables independientes para predecir complicaciones graves. El fallo en el rescate es mayor en los pacientes no intervenidos quirúrgicamente. (AU)

Introduction: To challenge the risk factors described in Tokyo Guidelines in acute calculous cholecystitis. Methods: Retrospective single center cohort study with 963 patients with acute cholecystitis during a period of 5 years. Some 725 patients with a “pure” Acute calculous cholecystitis were selected. The analysis included 166 variables encompassing all risk factors described in Tokyo Guidelines. The Propensity Score Matching method selected two subgroups of patients with equal comorbidities, to compare the severe complications rate according to the initial treatment (Surgical vs. non-surgical). We analyzed the failure-to-rescue as a quality indicator in the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis. Results: The median age was 69 years (IQR 53-80). 85.1% of the patients were ASA II or III. The grade of the acute calculous cholecystitis was mild in a 21%, moderate in 39% and severe in 40% of the patients. Cholecystectomy was performed in 95% of the patients. The overall complications rate was 43% and the mortality was 3.6%. The Logistic Regression model isolated 3 risk factor for severe complication: ASA>II, cancer without metastases and moderate to severe renal disease. The failure-to-rescue (8%) was higher in patients with non-surgical treatment (32% vs. 7%; P=.002). After Propensity Score Matching, the number of severe complications was similar between Surgical and Non-Surgical treatment groups (48.5% vs 62.5%; P=.21). Conclusions: The recommended treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis is the laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Only three risk factors from the Tokyo Guidelines list appeared as independent predictors of severe complications. The failure-to-rescue is higher in non-surgically treated patients. (AU)

A Predictive Tool for Choledocholithiasis in Patients Undergoing Emergency Cholecystectomy.

Background: Management of acute cholecystitis with emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been established; however, detection and management of concurrent choledocholithiasis are debated. The aim of this study is to develop a more accurate choledocholithiasis predictive model. Materials and Methods: A 9-year audit of emergency cholecystectomies and evaluation of preoperative factors in predictive models. Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis/Youdon Index was used to identify thresholds maximizing these associations for continuous variables. Results: 1601/1828 patients were analyzed. Patients who were diagnosed with choledocholithiasis were more likely to be febrile on admission, have a higher C-reactive Protein, and higher median bilirubin (25.0 µmol/L versus 11.0 µmol/L, P < .001). When excluding bilirubin, multivariate analysis detected several significant variables, including fever, biliary tree dilatation, or a common bile duct stone seen on ultrasound. When bilirubin was included into the model, bilirubin of 20-39 µmol/L (odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-3.44) and ≥40 µmol/L (OR 4.84, 95% CI: 3.40-6.91) were shown to have increased likelihood of choledocholithiasis detection on intraoperative cholangiogram, with the ROC model having a significant C-statistic of 0.796 (P < .001). Discussion: A perfect predictive model for concurrent choledocholithiasis in acute cholecystitis does not exist; however, the results from this study are encouraging that high and low predictive groups can be established.

Prophylactic EUS-guided gallbladder drainage prevents acute cholecystitis in patients with malignant biliary obstruction and cystic duct orifice involvement: a randomized trial (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) and cystic duct orifice tumoral involvement have an increased risk for the development of acute cholecystitis after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement. We aimed to determine whether primary EUS-guided gallbladder drainage prevents acute cholecystitis in these patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized control trial in patients with distal MBO enrolled from July 2018 to July 2020. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: an interventional group treated with conventional ERCP biliary drainage with SEMS placement and subsequent primary EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) and a control group treated with conventional biliary drainage alone. The primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of post-treatment acute cholecystitis, assessed for ≤12 months or until death. The secondary outcomes were hospitalization length and median survival time. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in the study: 22 in each group. Five patients in the control group (22.7%) and none in the intervention group experienced acute cholecystitis. The median hospitalization time was significantly lower in the interventional group than in the control group (2 days vs 1 day, P = .017). There was no difference in the observed median survival rates in the primary EUS-GBD group (2.9 months) and the control group (2.8 months) (P = .580). CONCLUSION: In this single-center study of patients with unresectable MBO and occlusion of the cystic duct orifice, prophylactic EUS-GBD demonstrated a reduced incidence of acute cholecystitis.

High rates of recurrence of gallstone associated episodes following acute cholecystitis during long term follow-up: a retrospective comparative study of patients who did not receive surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Patients who are admitted with acute cholecystitis (AC) and do not undergo urgent cholecystectomy, are usually referred for interval cholecystectomy. Many do not have surgery for various reasons, and some of those do not suffer from any recurrent symptoms. The primary objective of this study was to assess the rate and nature of recurrent gallstone-related events in this population over a long period, and its association with demographic and clinical parameters. A secondary objective was to assess the reasons for not undergoing surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, where the study group were adult patients admitted with AC. Patients that have suffered recurrent episodes were compared with those who did not. A control group of patients that had undergone cholecystectomy following an admission with AC was used for comparison. Demographic and clinical parameters were recorded for all patients, and the association with a recurrent episode was analyzed using univariate analysis. RESULTS: The study population was 197 patients. The group of patients who did not undergo surgery were significantly older (68.7 vs 54.2) and sicker (ASA > 3 50% vs 19%). The rate of recurrent episodes in the study group was 38.5%, and it was not found to be associated with the studied parameters. There was a trend towards higher gallstone disease specific mortality in the study group (5.5% vs 1.45% p = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: This is a study of long-term follow-up of patients following an episode of AC we showed that the rate of recurrent episodes is quite high and involves severe inflammatory diseases, such as obstructive jaundice and pancreatitis.

Acute Cholecystitis Associated with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis That Responded to Glucocorticoid Therapy.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a systemic disorder characterized by tissue eosinophilic infiltration and vasculitis. Although EGPA causes multiple organ damage, it causes cholecystitis less frequently. We herein report a case of acute cholecystitis associated with EGPA in which successful treatment with glucocorticoid therapy allowed surgery to be avoided. EGPA can present as acute cholecystitis. It is important not to overlook acute cholecystitis associated with EGPA in patients with abdominal pain with peripheral eosinophilia. Furthermore, in cases of mild cholecystitis associated with EGPA that are diagnosed preoperatively, cholecystectomy might be avoided with conservative glucocorticoid treatment.

Acute cholecystitis secondary to Raoultella ornithinolytica infection, complicated by sepsis, gallbladder perforation, hepatic abscess and bacteraemia.

Herein, a case of an immunocompromised patient in his early 70s is discussed who presented with clinical signs and symptoms compatible with sepsis from an intra-abdominal source and who was found to have blood cultures positive for the encapsulated Gram-negative pathogen Raoultella ornithinolytica, with the source of infection determined, via imaging, to be a case of acute cholecystitis complicated by gallbladder perforation, multiple pericholecystic and hepatic abscesses, and persistent bacteraemia. To our knowledge, this represents the first described case of cholecystitis and gallbladder perforation directly attributed to this species, and highlights both the pathogen's capacity to cause severe disease as well as the utility of a multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal patient outcome.

Digital Necrosis Due to Septic Embolism: An Unseen Complication of Gangrenous Cholecystitis.

Gangrenous cholecystitis is one of the most severe complications of cholelithiasis. It causes serious morbidity and mortality. The main pathology in this complication is progressive vascular insufficiency, which may lead to necrosis and perforation of the gallbladder wall. Vascular insufficiency can affect other organs besides the gallbladder. Since its symptoms are not different from that of acute cholecystitis, delayed diagnosis and treatment can cause death. Treatment is a surgical intervention as soon as the diagnosis is made. Complications such as wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, circulatory disorders, and lung problems can be seen in the postoperative period. Embolism and necrosis in distant organs as a complication of gangrenous cholecystitis have not been reported till date. In this case, we present a patient, who developed necrosis of the fingers and toes due to septic embolism as a complication of gangrenous cholecystitis. Key Words: Cholelithiasis, Acute cholecystitis, Gangrene, Necrosis.

[Endoscopic transduodenal removal of gallbladder stones in a patient with necrotizing pancreatitis].

This case report describes a 55-year-old man with gallstone-induced necrotizing pancreatitis, colonic fistula and subsequent acute cholecystitis. Due to hostile abdominal milieu, traditional cholecystectomy was not possible, why endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transduodenal drainage of the gallbladder and endoscopic stone extraction was performed successfully. EUS-guided transduodenal drainage of the gallbladder with endoscopic removal of stones constitutes a safe alternative for patients who have cholecystitis, which is not suitable for cholecystectomy.